Voters 0
0
Cluster stats update
- Live
- Subscribe
 |
Angus Rogers |
Design here:
www.figma.com/file/hfFa1plyMeLg9jX5FeSU2z/Community-Lab-2.0?node-id=3475%3A65785
Again, I say we skip % stuff for now and just implement it like this:
www.figma.com/file/hfFa1plyMeLg9jX5FeSU2z/Community-Lab-2.0?node-id=3484%3A67943
It's not clear what the counts and percentage increases/decreases are referring to. The count for 'cluster groups' doesn't have a % sign next to the arrow - is this intentional? Also, what query is used for the member count? Is this counting the total number of people associated with a cluster (i.e. unique count of users who are members of groups within that cluster)?
Activity Newest / Oldest
Angus Rogers
Post moved to this board
Angus Rogers
Status changed to: Live
Aleksandra Boguslawska
Status changed to: Development
Aleksandra Boguslawska
Slight change we've made, including upvotes:
www.figma.com/file/hfFa1plyMeLg9jX5FeSU2z/Community-Lab-2.0?node-id=3475%3A65785
Waiting for more info from @Angus as we don't know what was implemented XD
Angus Rogers
Looks good to me. I've attached a screenshot below - does that all check out with the changes you've made to the new design?
Aleksandra Boguslawska
yeah I think so. Not sure why there's even a need for group moderators in stats?
I think # of members, posts, replies (comments) and upvotes is the most important right now. Same for the groups.
Also if we can't implement + there isn't enough data for the % then we should just remove it as right now it just creates confusion and sucks.
Angus Rogers
Yep agree with both comments. @addjam If there isn't enough data, can we run a query that just hides the increase/decrease and if there is enough data, it shows as planned?
Milosz Falinski
@Angus - just note that I'm not an admin of any Cluster so I haven't been able to verify this. Can you share a screenshot?
Angus Rogers
Angus Rogers
Post moved to this board
Angus Rogers
Status changed to: Design